Ninth 的个人资料NinthFloor by NX照片日志列表更多 工具 帮助

日志


Three news Journalism or lack of it

Known for Don Brash's race relations rant four years ago, tonight it was John Key's turn. However this time it was not for any policy announcement, but rather the fact that he apparently did not want the media there to cover it.

TV three's political coverage is often schizophrenic but this story was particularly annoying. 

1.  What was the point of the story?

2.  Where do they get off calling Don Brash's race relations speech a 'rant' - an emotive word which conveys an opinion.  They should just stick to the news and let the viewer form an opinion. 

Siding with Winston Peter's is like making a pack with the devil, but he does have a point about political journalism in this country.  And TV one isn't any better - remember their shocking story that someone in the National Party wasn't a fully signed up climate change believer. 

Don Brash , TV 3 , Journalism  

 

Helen's out of date!

...... car wise. 
 
The picture below is of BMW's new 7-series.   It goes on sale in the UK on 15 November 2008 - which coincidentally (or ironically) is one of the proposed election dates. 
 
Looks a nice car too - leaner than the current 7-series.  Though, on first impression, I don't like the tail lights and the oversized kidney grill.
 
 

Helen has no time for personal activities

 
 

While John Key shared quality time with his family in Omaha and Bill English mixed pleasure with business in Samoa, there was no time for holidays in Labour-land.

To rub in the point, Helen Clark said of her National rivals: "They do tend to work pretty short weeks and years in my experience. I've found this job is pretty all-consuming."

 
In her attempt to have a dig at John Key and Bill "clever man" English over the hours they work, I think she casts herself in a negative light.  I would like the PM of New Zealand to maintain a work/life balance, just like anyone else.  If the PM has no time for herself, then to me that shows she's not working efficiently, or delegating appropriately, or is creating work for herself (she has to 'look after' the country). 
Don Brash was also renowned for his workaholic nature.  The difference with him is that he wasn't one to gloat about it, or more tellingly, use it for a personal attack.
 
 

Helen Clark's foreign affair expertise is a myth

 
 

At the 60th anniversary dinner, Israeli ambassador Yuval Rotem delivered a strong message that Israel wants New Zealand to stand up for human rights around the world.

The subtext (delivered more directly in a subsequent official foreign affairs consultation in Wellington) was that New Zealand should take a more condemnatory approach to Iran, not just beat-up on Israel.  

I reckon Helen's much touted foreign affairs expertise is nothing more than a farce.  On the big issues such as Israel, a nuclear armed Iran, Iraqi situation, and Mugabe - Helen Clark is either silent or a vocal critic at best.  She offers no solutions, and she's not prepared to go out on a limb - just repeat her stock UN line.
 
But Downer is expected to be confirmed soon as special UN envoy for Cyprus and will continue to be a public voice on foreign affairs through his new blog.  Read it - it's probably the closest you'll get to obtaining a true conservative perspective than anything served up by National here.
 
I must find his blog and add it to my RSS feed reader.  And I agree with Fran O'Sullivan's point that National has a 'lily-livered' approach to foreign affairs.  But to do otherwise would invite Helen to accuse National of being an American puppet.  Helen has no qualms about damaging our relationship with the US in order to score cheap political points (referring to the 2005 election).
 
 

John Roughan on KiwiSaver

 
 

The scheme celebrated its first birthday on Tuesday with 718,000 members - more than double the number predicted in the first year. The only people complaining about it are those annoying economists who see the difference between individual gains and the national welfare.

They fear the scheme will not add to total personal savings, merely displace previous savings schemes.

In the Herald last weekend Maria Slade reported an estimate that as little as 9 per cent of the money in KiwiSaver accounts so far is new saving, a percentage the researcher reckoned would not cover the administration and compliance costs of the scheme.

Westpac economist Dominick Stephens said KiwiSaver had cost the taxpayers $497 million in its first 11 months, an amount that could have added to national savings if it had been left in the Budget's fund for future public pensions.

Even that fund is questioned by some savings professionals who point out that a superannuation scheme is only as good as the future economy that will have to pay out. From that point of view, the best retirement insurance is the investment made in the economy today.

Anyone who believes that the best investments are made by those who stand to lose if they get it wrong would argue the economy would be stronger in the long run if the KiwiSaver incentives were turned into personal tax cuts.

I generally try to avoid cut and pasting so much from an article, but John Roughan's points are irrefutable! 
I'm a signed-up member of KiwiSaver just because the incentives are too good to pass up.  Now some people like KiwiSaver because it locks away their savings so they can't touch it. 
So why don’t they give people the choice... Kiwisaver for those who want their savings locked away & a tax refund for those who want to put the money into their own savings account.  I'd take the latter option. 
 
 
 

Secret agendas works both ways....

 
 

Had Labour given an inkling at the last election of the premium they have had to pay to re-nationalise the railway, and the fortune it is going to cost to cover its likely losses, National's last campaign would have feasted on the information.

But now that the deed is done, the politics have changed. The purchase is the status quo and National will not dare put re-privatisation before the electorate this year, though that may be what it ultimately does with the trains if not the tracks.

 John Roughan is right.  I can't remember anti-smacking, Kiwisaver, or re-nationalising the railway being on Labour's agenda last election.  
So all the unreasonable demands for National to reveal what they'll do in government should be meet with the question 'what the hell will Labour do?'.
 
 
 
 

Obama moves to the centre......

 
 
We're beginning to understand why Barack Obama keeps protesting so vigorously against the prospect of "George Bush's third term." Maybe he's worried that someone will notice that he's the candidate who's running for it.

The Bush policies I want Obama to adopt are free trade and a commitment to Iraq.  Fingers crossed. 
So with that in mind perhaps the best outcome for the US election would be Obama in the White House and a republican controlled congress.
 
Hit tip:  The Hive via Kiwiblog 
 
 
 

An insite into David Cameron

 
 
Put this or other choices on tax or climate change or social justice or social responsibility to a member of Team Cameron and they soon reply “Ah but he is a pragmatist”. 
He sounds like a person who has been on a long political journey to get to where he is; the leader of the Conservatives.  Some interesting parallels with John Key.   
 
John Key and David Cameron represent modern conservatives, the future for their political philosophy and consequently our future.  They're socially liberal and concerned with social justice, but see them as secondary to providing effective, efficient government that doesn't squash personal responsibility and individual freedoms.
 
US conservatives (the Republicans) aren't quite their yet.  Which is why loosing to Obama could be the best thing for them. 
 

 

TV3 reports that Clark got it wrong!

 
"Can I assure her that neither I, nor my family trust, was an owner of shares in Tranz Rail at that time, and she has misled the House."

Miss Clark made no comment, taking the back route out of Parliament. Through a spokesman she says she accepts Mr Key's word. He now wants her to say sorry.

"Sorry would be nice, but I won't hold my breath," says Mr Key.

Heh - Labour's most aggressive line of attack for a while, delivered by the PM herself (instead of Cosgrove, or Cullen, or Goff) turns out to be complete rubbish.  I'm pleased channel three reported this because channel one certainly didn't and after such an intense battle in parliament one was left wondering. 
 
The thing is even if the PM's allegations were true, a man like Mr Key would have shares all over the place so it's hardly a demonstrated conflict of interest.  A real scandal would be if Mr Key had invested all his shares in one basket....and then said something so their value increased - which didn't happen of course (much to the PM's disappointment). 
 
This is the first time the PM has fronted the attack, so it'll be interesting to see how the public reacts.  To me it looks like she's clutching at screws big time!
 

In the house (Herald cartoon)

 
Quite extraordinary goings on in the house today.
 
1.  The PM couldn't answer any questions on the cost of the KiwiRail but instead smeared John Key with an allegation that he personally benefited from the sale of the rail in 1993 (at least that's what I think  she was alleging).
 
2.  Rodney Hide rode to his rescue - way to go Rodney, he really got to the guts of the matter.
 
2.  Key didn't respond to the allegation initially (why..?) but later tabled a press release revealing the PM is talking rubbish.
 
It was hard to know who was in trouble... Helen Clark or John Key.   
 

 

NZed Rail viability

 
The pitfalls of political economics were evident in the Prime Minister's remarks yesterday. "One locomotive can pull the equivalent freight of 65 trucks," declared Helen Clark. But one locomotive cannot take that freight to 65 different destinations. The train will need trucks to deliver much of its cargo at one end of the journey or the other, often both. Multiple handling probably costs more than single long haul saves. Witness Toll's wish to keep the railway's profitable truck depots.
^I was going to blog on this very point today's Editorial made.  The more I think about it the more I question the viability of profitable rail in NZed.  In Aussie when transporting goods over a long distance e.g. Perth of Sydney it makes a lot of sense to use rail.  But in NZed, a country bisected by the Cook Strait, it makes more sense to use trucks.  On a 'long haul' from Auckland to Wellington a truck can deliver to various out of the way locations on the way. 
However, I still hope they're able to make KiwiRail successfull.
 

Obama has an early lead over McCain

 
 
I know it's early days yet,  but Obama is ahead in the polls.  One poll recently put him 12 points ahead of McCain.  I suppose all the coverage that Obama received from the primaries has to be taken into account. 
Regardless the Obama McCain battle feels like a sideshow with the real election battle already been fought - Hilary vs. Obama.  
 

Bolger to head Govt's 'KiwiRail' service

 
"We will now be able to make the investments necessary to develop a world-class 21st century rail system for New Zealanders."
It's back to the future!  I was right on the money with regards to the name. 
 
The short and thick of it is that Labour won't be around to prove they can make rail a success (see graph).  The job will fall to National. 
 
 

 

Possibly more stolen emails....

 
 
'If he [Hager] still has access to National’s emails, this is a massive problem.

Even assuming National has tightened up on its security and what it sends through the Parliamentary email server since 2005, there is always going to be enough email traffic to embarrass any political party if it falls into the wrong hands. Short of going back to carrier pigeon or stone tablets, there is little the party can do - email is an essential modern tool for political organisations".

Hollow Men heads for screen

Activist Nicky Hager's The Hollow Men, which detailed the inside workings of the National Party's campaign before the 2005 election using leaked personal e-mails from leader Don Brash's computer and other internal documents, has been turned into a feature-length documentary.

One issue that really gets my blood boiling is Nicky Hager and Dr Brash's stolen emails.  When the main opposition party, or any party for that matter, cannot correspond in confidence then that is a huge thread to our democracy.  More of a thread than the Electoral Finance Act and Winston Peters combined.  Nicky Hager is nothing more than a terrorist. 

Strong words for sure, but that's how strong I feel about this issue.  The use of stolen emails would be justified in the minds of some if Hager unearth a ghastly secret.  But Nicky Hager could not find a smoking-gun even with access to hundreds of Dr Brash's emails.  Much of what Hager 'revealed' had already been aired by the media.  This shows the media are doing their job and such skullduggery is totally unnecessary.

In the USA the Watergate scandal sparked a massive federal investigation and resulted in the resignation of a President.  What happens in New Zealand; the police took a year to tell us they had nothing.  The Labour government provides money so the stolen emails can be made into a play and a film.  It would be a joke if it weren't true.

The media are reluctant to link Labour with this crime, but I suspect that Helen's much talked about 'neutron bomb' is really just more stolen emails.  Even if Labour had no part in stealing the emails, they are a party to the crime by using them for political purposes.  It is also well known Helen and Heather stand over the police, so the investigation into the theft would hardly be impartial.  Helen has expressed NO abhorrence to what has happened despite the implications for our democracy. 

I could still respect Helen if my only disagreement with her was over political philosophy.  Hell I could even be converted on a point or two.  But Helen's involvement in this is disgusting and reveals her true unprincipled nature.  As Dr Brash said this Labour government is indeed the most corrupt in New Zealand's history. 

^This is my most strongly worded post to date and unlikely to be topped. 

 

By-election 'sends message to Rudd'

Nationals candidate Darren Chester triumphed with 63 per cent of the two-party preferred vote in yesterday's poll, against Labor candidate Darren McCubbin's 37 per cent.
"I think it's an extraordinary result that you have a 7 per cent swing against Mr Rudd only seven months after he has won the election, which would be one of the largest swings against a newly elected government, I think, since Federation."
Rather surprising.  Just the other day I read a headline that the Coalition was preparing for the worst.  Whether this reflexes dissatisfaction with the Rudd government or just dissatisfaction with the current economic climate is a subject for debate. 
 
My assessment of the Rudd govt. is a bit of a mixed bag.  Their efforts to reduce government spending and inflation is commendable.  But their '2020 summit' and EU style Australasian/South East Asia pact idea is just puffery.  Kevin Rudd's leadership style is also a mixed bag.  One minute he's dramatic and serious and the next he's acting a bit of a clown.
 
David Farrar said the Liberal leader Brendon Nelson was unelectable.  Granted Brendon does seem an unlikely leader, but that's why I like him.  He seems more genuine that Kevin.  David has declared his allegiance for Malcolm Turnball, which may colour his comments. 
 

Jim Bolger to chair new rail company

"Full details, including the structure of the company, its name and even the new paint job for the trains, will be announced at the official hand over from Toll to the government in Wellington on Tuesday. ONE News will bring you the story.."

I see it now - the launch of the new train company is going to be a massive public relations effort; photo ops, news paper spreads, the works.  It's actually just the positive news that Labour needs.   The optimistic vision Labour will seek to convey and the fact they've appointed a former National Party prime minister will go someway to drowning out the criticism  Because after all everyone wants rail to be a success.  But the criticism is very valid.  I would probably only use a train perhaps once a year - if that!. 
I don't see how the train company won't just become a black whole for money.
 
Oh my pick for the name will be something like KiwiRail.
 

John Armstrong: Does National have a Cullen in its ranks?

"This is the Cullen that the public has tired of and grown to dislike - the quick-tongued, arrogant-sounding smarty pants who was grudgingly slow to get his head around personal tax cuts."

^Well that's certainly the Cullen I've got to know.  But there's no doubt he's an effective operator - just a shame about his ideology.  In fact with Cullen holding so many important portfolios one wonders what the PM actually does. 
But to answer Armstrong's questions - Bill English first springs to mind.  But in terms of being a Mr Fix-it I reckon none other than John Key will fill that role.  It's going to be interesting to watch which National ministers will shine in their up and coming administration.
 

Nandor shatters shackles of time

Nandor shatters shackles of time

"Nandor Tanczos left Parliament yesterday, saying he was going away to cleanse his soul and wouldn't need to know the time any more."

^Cleanse his soul... cleanse it with dope perhaps Tongue out.

Referring to Question Time:  "It's a time when I'm most ashamed of being a member of Parliament," he said.

"You all know what I'm talking about."

That was a reference to the abusive shouting and bad behaviour that go on during question time.

^I agreed.  Nandor was/is my favourite green MP.  It's easy to disregard him because of his dreadlocks, but he has many positive qualities.  He's not from the psychotic far left of the party and advocates negotiating with both sides of the house.  He's apparently pretty onto it  with IT issues.  He also showed good manners in the house - his dislike of shouting matches is something akin to Don Brash.

As a non-dope smoker I respect his principled stand on the issue, and dare I say it, even his right to smoke dope. 


Dope, Nandor Tanczos , Greens

We must go for nuclear power, says AWU | NEWS.com.au

Quote

We must go for nuclear power, says AWU | NEWS.com.au

""If we are going to be a green Labor government, then we have to look at nuclear," Mr Howes told The Australian newspaper."

"Mr Carr and Mr Howes are pushing for Labor to drop its long-standing policy of rejecting nuclear power. "

"Mr Carr said nuclear power was the critical bridge between the carbon era and energy from renewable resources. "

^Not only are the Australians having the nuclear debate, but it's being debated within the Australian Labor party!  Over here Helen Clark has completely shut down debate on this issue within her own party & the nation through scare tactics.  It's the hallmark of this PM to put short-term political convenience over the long term needs of the country.  She'd rather dick around with anti-smacking laws rather than address the shortfalls in our energy strategy.  The irony is that if the lights started going out in NZed, or if the price of electricity sky-rocketed more than it has, domestic violence and smacking is bound to increase.

,